HP EliteBook 8460p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8460p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 161C
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '19 at 21:08
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2860QM-$469
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 184
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 441
48% 382 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
HP(103C 161C) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 1.59
2% 2.54 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 4.39
3% 3.09 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 467 462 434 432 432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 437
Mixed 410
SusWrite 448
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 32.3
108% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 365
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 131%
SanDisk SDDR-339 64GB
40GB free, PID cfc5
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 78 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 79.3
Write 70.1
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 75.7
97% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.9
257% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.7% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8460p Builds (Compare 1,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8460p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $62
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback