HP EliteBook 8460p

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP EliteBook 8460p (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 161C
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20111222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '19 at 19:46
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2860QM-$469 4,317 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 90.6 2-Core 182 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 445 48% 383 Pts	64-Core 445 28% 445 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 161C) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.2% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 3.69 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.57 fps	MRender 3.57 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 4.48 3% 3.12 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.2% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90 12,565 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 465 466 439 439 434 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 445 Mixed 411 SusWrite 451 100% 442 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 54.1 4K Mixed 37.3 118% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 393 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 366 276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 131%
SanDisk SDDR-339 64GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 40GB free, PID cfc5 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 78 75 75 74 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	39% Below average	Read 85.2 Write 66.8 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 75.9 96% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 4 257% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8460p Builds (Compare 1,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8460p

CPU
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples	521x
Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples	256x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	112x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	813x
Radeon HD 6470MAMDBench 2%, 4,805 samples	122x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	61x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	40x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	24x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	16x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	452x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	212x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	120x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16