Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140716
Uptime9.4 Days
Run DateAug 25 '19 at 16:34
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 126
2-Core 238
88% 153 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 478
64% 480 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Palit(1569 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1492 MHz, MLim: 1790 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 61.1
52% 64.8 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 62
Splatting 54.7
51% 63 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 229 254 179 77 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 431
Mixed 343
SusWrite 162
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 50.4
164% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 227
207% 316 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
931GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 282 306 344 384 388 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 436
Mixed 408
SusWrite 315
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 53
162% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
49GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 278 301 315 317 295 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 432
Mixed 406
SusWrite 282
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 54.9
184% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 360
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 109%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
687GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 177 177 175 178 178 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 140
Write 93.5
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 173
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 114%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
396GB free
Firmware: SM12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 99 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 96
Write 82.2
Mixed 68
SusWrite 98
64% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
341GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 132 132 131 131 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 106
Write 100
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 131
73% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY16GX3M2A2133C11 0215 CM3X4GB2133C11Y4 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2133C11 0215 CM3X4GB2133C11Y4 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 24.5
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 23.9
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $907
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback