Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140716
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateAug 28 '19 at 20:45
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 256
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 404
57% 419 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 80 52 47 49 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 456
Mixed 365
SusWrite 89.1
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 49.1
163% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 232
210% 319 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
931GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 345 378 351 340 366 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 402
Mixed 445
SusWrite 340
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 54
178% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 354
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
49GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 317 318 308 310 287 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 461
Mixed 440
SusWrite 300
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 53.7
176% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 358
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 109%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
639GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 176 178 178 178 178 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 142
Write 116
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 178
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
396GB free
Firmware: SM12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 99 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 98
Write 77
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 97.6
63% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
341GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 132 132 132 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 99.7
Write 106
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 132
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY16GX3M2A2133C11 0215 CM3X4GB2133C11Y4 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2133C11 0215 CM3X4GB2133C11Y4 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.1% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 25
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 22.5
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $907
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback