ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Hewlett-Packard
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory	10.8 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '19 at 19:24
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	PSE-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 79 1-Core 103 2-Core 205 73% 129 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 381 50% 378 Pts	64-Core 399 25% 399 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.3 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57% Above average	Lighting 71.3 Reflection 68 Parallax 89 58% 76.1 fps	MRender 72.9 Gravity 72.8 Splatting 58.6 55% 68.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 275 253 161 111 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 473 Mixed 381 SusWrite 210 87% 389 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 88.7 4K Mixed 51.4 170% 59.4 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 319 251% 348 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 130GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 105 110 111 113 110 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	63% Good	Read 110 Write 106 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 110 73% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 69%
WD WD3200BEVS-16VAT0 320GB 1,492 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 109GB free Firmware: 12.01A12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 32 36 36 36 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 44.3 Write 46.2 Mixed 31 SusWrite 31.3 28% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 37%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 34GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 155 160 160 160 157 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Read 144 Write 116 Mixed 52 SusWrite 158 85% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 108%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 165GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 62GB free Firmware: 0342 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.8% Poor	Read 35.5 Write 33.7 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 36.6 24% 33 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 23%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB 16,483 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 36GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 63 58 62 60 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 62 Write 64.2 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 62.3 78% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 1302 PSD34G160081 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 1302 PSD34G160081 14GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.7% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 15.9 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 17.4 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 82.4 48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback