ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Hewlett-Packard
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory	9.3 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '20 at 02:05
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	PSE-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 105 2-Core 204 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 398 53% 399 Pts	64-Core 396 24% 396 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.2 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	55.3% Above average	Lighting 69.4 Reflection 67.5 Parallax 88 57% 75 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 70.9 Splatting 55.9 53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 273 280 271 266 259 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 480 Mixed 369 SusWrite 283 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 91.1 4K Mixed 53.3 179% 62 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 359 270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 116GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 119 120 119 119 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 116 Write 113 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 118 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 69%
WD WD3200BEVS-16VAT0 320GB 1,492 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 120GB free Firmware: 12.01A12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 32 31 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Read 48.3 Write 44.3 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 31.5 29% 39.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 37%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 57GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 165 166 166 165 166 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 116 Write 106 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 164 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 112% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 108%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 250GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 9GB free Firmware: 0342 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 40 Write 37.8 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 39.8 26% 35.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 31%
WD i HTS54 External 500GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 44GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 33 33 36 33 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 38 Write 20 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 34.1 37% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 1302 PSD34G160081 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 1302 PSD34G160081 14GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.7% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 12.4 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 14.4 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback