ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Hewlett-Packard
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory	10.6 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '20 at 14:57
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	PSE-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 104 2-Core 202 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 388 52% 388 Pts	64-Core 382 24% 382 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Lighting 71.5 Reflection 68 Parallax 89.2 58% 76.2 fps	MRender 69.5 Gravity 72.5 Splatting 55.5 53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 273 275 271 252 266 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 469 Mixed 390 SusWrite 287 91% 407 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 85.2 4K Mixed 50.3 168% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 358 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 116GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 117 116 116 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 56 Write 59.7 Mixed 46 SusWrite 116 51% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 69%
WD WD3200BEVS-16VAT0 320GB 1,492 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 120GB free Firmware: 12.01A12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 32 31 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Read 49.7 Write 48.5 Mixed 31 SusWrite 31.5 30% 40.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 37%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 57GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 163 165 166 164 165 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 134 Write 131 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 163 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 116% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 108%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 250GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 9GB free Firmware: 0342 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 39 39 40 40 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Read 38.7 Write 40 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 39.7 26% 35.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 31%
WD i HTS54 External 500GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 44GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 40 42 41 42 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 40 Write 39.7 Mixed 28 SusWrite 41 50% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 1302 PSD34G160081 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 1302 PSD34G160081 14GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.1% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 13.4 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 14.6 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback