MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A34
MotherboardMSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34)  (all builds)
Memory32.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170215
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 11 '19 at 15:03
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 40.6
1-Core 46.4
2-Core 84.1
34% 57 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 265
24% 202 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1230 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.5% Average
Lighting 55.7
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 72.9
45% 62.7 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 55.4
Splatting 52.1
46% 56.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 648 321 314 307 302 297 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 936
Write 1,027
Mixed 788
SusWrite 365
175% 779 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 29.6
107% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 802
DQ Write 457
DQ Mixed 547
429% 602 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 120%
Great: 254%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
133GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 476 281 244 256 228 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 372
Write 348
Mixed 359
SusWrite 326
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 36.7
120% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 328
248% 334 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
226GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 160 159 159 156 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 86.7
Write 122
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 158
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
133GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 126 128 126 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 154
Write 86.7
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 127
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
200GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 160 159 161 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 75.3
Write 64.5
Mixed 50
SusWrite 161
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
17GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 54
Write 51.7
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 57
68% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4 CMK16GX4 CMK32GX4 CMK32GX4 48GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.4% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.4
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34) Builds (Compare 3,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34) - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback