MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A34
MotherboardMSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34)  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170215
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 11 '19 at 15:40
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 63.8
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 196
66% 119 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 776
69% 583 Pts
64-Core 1,054
65% 1,054 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1230 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
45.3% Average
Lighting 55.9
Reflection 58.9
Parallax 76.4
46% 63.8 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 54
Splatting 52.1
45% 55.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 783 629 623 597 500 305 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1874
Write 1,582
Mixed 634
SusWrite 573
259% 1,166 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 47.8
161% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 777
DQ Write 484
DQ Mixed 636
472% 632 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 188%
Great: 254%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
138GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 471 291 240 245 252 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 380
Write 247
Mixed 207
SusWrite 326
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 37.2
115% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 329
240% 310 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
226GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 159 157 155 159 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 102
Write 112
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 157
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
133GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 118 117 119 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 154
Write 108
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 118
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
200GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 160 158 110 131 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 152
Write 120
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 144
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4 CMK16GX4 CMK32GX4 CMK32GX4 48GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.9% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34) Builds (Compare 3,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34) - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback