Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJul 05 '19 at 01:19
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 122
52% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 287
32% 255 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 62.8
54% 66.5 fps
MRender 74.9
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 59.3
53% 66 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 64GB-$56
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 25 27 26 25 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 309
Write 27.7
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 29.1
23% 108 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 4.1
36% 8.63 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 48%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
406GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 43 45 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 463
Write 45.2
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 44.9
34% 159 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
56% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 134%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
511GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 125 131 134 132 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 90.2
Write 86.5
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 130
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.3
251% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 180 177 179 181 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 168
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 179
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 114%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 64GB
42GB free, PID 1000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 21 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 38
Write 36
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 22.1
40% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.8
116% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 12
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $689
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback