Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 00:56
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 131
58% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 302
34% 267 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Lighting 67.9
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 69
55% 69.3 fps
MRender 74.1
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 56.2
52% 65.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 64GB-$56
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 41 35 33 34 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.5% Poor
Read 245
Write 37.5
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 36.4
21% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 5.8
36% 9.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 48%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
417GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 45 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 457
Write 44.7
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 45.6
34% 158 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
60% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 37%
Great: 134%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
540GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 124 124 125 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 130
Write 128
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 123
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.3
253% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 189 187 190 191 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 154
Mixed 86
SusWrite 190
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 12.3
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $689
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback