Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	13.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	May 31 '19 at 02:31
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40 5,908 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 66 2-Core 126 57% 91.7 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 295 33% 258 Pts	64-Core 290 18% 290 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Lighting 66.9 Reflection 70 Parallax 68.4 54% 68.4 fps	MRender 73.3 Gravity 63.6 Splatting 56 52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SanDisk SSD 64GB-$56 3,862 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.9 11 6 5.8 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	13.1% Very poor	Read 117 Write 17.8 Mixed 37 SusWrite 5.9 10% 44.4 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 4.2 28% 6.47 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 48%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 285GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 43 45 45 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 460 Write 45 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 44.5 34% 158 MB/s	4K Read 36.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.8 57% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 134%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB 6,863 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 307GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 48 49 49 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	50% Average	Read 125 Write 49.8 Mixed 59 SusWrite 49.2 52% 70.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 46 45 46 46 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 207 Write 4.2 Mixed 8.8 SusWrite 41.2 47% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 55% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 114%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 64GB 839 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 58GB free, PID 1000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 22 21 22 21 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 23.5 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 23.1 34% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.1 92% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	43.9% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 15.3 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 12.1 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16