Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '19 at 12:30
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40 5,908 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 62.8 2-Core 118 55% 87.8 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 277 31% 244 Pts	64-Core 297 18% 297 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.5% Poor	Lighting 30.9 Reflection 38 Parallax 6.78 25% 25.2 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 39.7 Splatting 30.7 29% 36 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SanDisk SSD 64GB-$56 3,862 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 35 33 27 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 311 Write 38 Mixed 70.7 SusWrite 32.8 24% 113 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 5.9 36% 8.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 48%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 406GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 41 44 43 45 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 402 Write 43 Mixed 75 SusWrite 42.5 30% 140 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 49% 11 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 134%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB 6,863 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 518GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 120 129 127 129 130 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	76% Very good	Read 141 Write 128 Mixed 90 SusWrite 123 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.3 247% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 175 182 181 180 180 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 147 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 175 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 114%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 64GB 839 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 42GB free, PID 1000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 19 22 22 20 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 34 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 21.8 38% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.1 90% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	47% Average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 9.5 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16