Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '19 at 16:31
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 94
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 159
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 484
46% 379 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 862C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 73
Parallax 67.8
58% 70.6 fps
MRender 69.1
Gravity 66.6
Splatting 66.9
55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 235 249 259 253 219 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 417
Mixed 354
SusWrite 235
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 47.3
154% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 178
149% 215 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
23GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 143 144 139 144 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 159
Write 80.2
Mixed 91
SusWrite 143
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
56GB free
Firmware: CR100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 69 72 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 76.5
Write 84.2
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 70.7
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 44%
WL3000GSA6454G 3TB
16GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 68 66 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 117
Write 58.7
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 67.3
58% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53%
Great: 95%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44
21GB free
Firmware: GM2OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 71 69 71 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 83
Write 86.8
Mixed 49
SusWrite 71.2
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 50%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 89.8
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 75.8
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.2% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 19
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 15.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback