Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory14.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '19 at 12:56
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 71
2-Core 152
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 510
48% 398 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 862C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2175 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.6% Good
Lighting 78.4
Reflection 80.4
Parallax 76.5
64% 78.4 fps
MRender 78.1
Gravity 74.7
Splatting 77.4
63% 76.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 218 248 269 268 266 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 409
Mixed 361
SusWrite 244
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 52.2
168% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 185
152% 218 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
23GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 142 119 114 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 142
Write 129
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 130
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78%
Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
56GB free
Firmware: CR100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 70 71 72 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 75
Write 80.5
Mixed 51
SusWrite 71.4
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 44%
WL3000GSA6454G 3TB
16GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 101
Write 97
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 67.9
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 95%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44
21GB free
Firmware: GM2OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 71 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 81.5
Write 86.3
Mixed 49
SusWrite 72
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 50%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 75 76 77 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 105
Write 83.3
Mixed 59
SusWrite 75.7
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.8% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 18.6
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 14.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $288Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback