Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '19 at 06:33
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 108
55% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 357
33% 278 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 862C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2175 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59% Above average
Lighting 72.1
Reflection 78.8
Parallax 72.8
59% 74.6 fps
MRender 74.5
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 71.7
59% 72.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 230 236 265 268 253 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 448
Write 407
Mixed 373
SusWrite 244
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 41.3
135% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 181
150% 216 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
23GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 143 145 119 113 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 166
Write 116
Mixed 73
SusWrite 133
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
56GB free
Firmware: CR100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 70 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 76.5
Write 82.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 71.4
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 44%
WL3000GSA6454G 3TB
16GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 69 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 112
Write 61.5
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 68.1
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 95%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44
21GB free
Firmware: GM2OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 85.7
Write 86.7
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 72
54% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 50%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 75 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 107
Write 90.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 75.9
61% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.6% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 19
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback