Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '19 at 22:02
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 155
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 500
47% 389 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 862C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2172 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 71
Reflection 73.2
Parallax 61.8
58% 68.7 fps
MRender 74.2
Gravity 68
Splatting 67.7
57% 70 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 213 248 267 268 272 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 411
Mixed 360
SusWrite 249
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 47.4
158% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 186
153% 218 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
23GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 141 145 119 112 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 150
Write 132
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 129
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
56GB free
Firmware: CR100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 70 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
42% Average
Read 75
Write 84
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 71.1
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42%
Great: 44%
WL3000GSA6454G 3TB
16GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 67 68 68 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 98
Write 95.5
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 67.8
62% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 95%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44
21GB free
Firmware: GM2OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 84.5
Write 78.8
Mixed 49
SusWrite 72.2
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 50%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 126
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 76
63% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.9% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 18.5
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 14.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback