Thunderobot ST Plus

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemThunderobot ST Plus  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT N858EX-H
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '19 at 17:41
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 824
82% 666 Pts
64-Core 970
60% 970 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 852B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9872
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 32.5
28% 32.3 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 34.3
28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D128 128GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C472101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 119 122 123 125 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 1,020
Write 403
Mixed 487
SusWrite 127
112% 509 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 70.1
244% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 395
DQ Write 405
DQ Mixed 388
295% 396 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 142%
Great: 142%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
911GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 130 131 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 113
Write 132
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 129
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Kingston 99U5711-002.A00G 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.2% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 12.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ST Plus Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Thunderobot ST Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback