Thunderobot ST Plus

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 63% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemThunderobot ST Plus  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT N858EX-H
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180413
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 06 '18 at 00:17
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 41%
CPU Throttled 63%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 44.1
2-Core 81
43% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 229
22% 182 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 852B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4939
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.45% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 6.94
6% 14.3 fps
MRender 7.48
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 14.2
8% 9.38 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.45%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D128 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C472101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 102 85 98 86 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 669
Write 184
Mixed 205
SusWrite 107
63% 291 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 17.2
64% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 139
111% 158 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 142%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 130 134 124 134 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 121
Write 108
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 131
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ST Plus Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Thunderobot ST Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback