TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMSI MS-7A69
MotherboardMSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170406
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 08 '19 at 04:41
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 432
57% 427 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 82.1%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$140
XFX(1682 C580)
CLim: 1465 MHz, MLim: 2150 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.3.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.6% Good
Lighting 80.2
Reflection 76
Parallax 98
65% 84.7 fps
MRender 73
Gravity 80.4
Splatting 60.4
57% 71.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 62.6%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$68
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 383 386 396 349 313 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 425
Mixed 222
SusWrite 371
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 53.4
188% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 284
232% 331 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 116%
 Great: 116%
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
46GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 55 175 55 56 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.9% Above average
Read 208
Write 103
Mixed 121
SusWrite 95.5
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 21.8
98% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 135
111% 155 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 50.9%
 Great: 85%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
705GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 160 165 165 165 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 173
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 159
96% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 97.6%
 Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ Kingston 9905702-010.A00G 04CB DDR4 2400 2OZ 859B BLT8G4D30AETA.K16FE 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 27.4
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 25.4
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 84.2%
 Great: 85%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69) Builds (Compare 1,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel  $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples383x
Core i5-7400Intel  $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples278x
Core i7-7700Intel  $130Bench 76%, 256,717 samples267x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples322x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples230x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples149x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $44Bench 103%, 951,591 samples82x
A400 240GBKingston  $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples60x
A400 120GBKingston  $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples44x
RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $38Bench 76%, 105,447 samples45x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL  $35Bench 71%, 98,777 samples36x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback