TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMSI MS-7A69
MotherboardMSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170406
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '19 at 07:53
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 220
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 423
53% 402 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 78.7%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$140
XFX(1682 C580)
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2025 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Lighting 76.5
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 92.7
62% 79.9 fps
MRender 69.4
Gravity 76.9
Splatting 57.7
55% 68 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 59.8%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$68
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 400 344 403 407 406 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 423
Mixed 371
SusWrite 404
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 54.1
190% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 280
230% 330 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 120%
 Great: 116%
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
46GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 55 56 55 56 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 288
Write 114
Mixed 151
SusWrite 91.4
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 24
118% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 138
132% 201 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 62.5%
 Great: 85%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
675GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 148 158 162 163 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 146
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 160
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 93.3%
 Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ Kingston 9905702-010.A00G 04CB DDR4 2400 2OZ 859B BLT8G4D30AETA.K16FE 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 27.2
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 25.3
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 85%
 Great: 85%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69) Builds (Compare 1,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel  $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples383x
Core i5-7400Intel  $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples278x
Core i7-7700Intel  $130Bench 76%, 256,717 samples267x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples322x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples230x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples149x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $44Bench 103%, 951,591 samples82x
A400 240GBKingston  $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples60x
A400 120GBKingston  $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples44x
RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $38Bench 76%, 105,447 samples45x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL  $35Bench 71%, 98,777 samples36x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback