TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMSI MS-7A69
MotherboardMSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170406
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateJan 01 '19 at 21:11
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 219
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 422
58% 427 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 82.5%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
XFX(1682 C580)
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 69.3
Parallax 85.8
55% 74.3 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 57.7
53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 54.5%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$96
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 408 409 409 414 412 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 419
Mixed 240
SusWrite 411
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 51.3
186% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 285
232% 329 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 118%
 Great: 116%
Kingston A400 120GB-$33
96GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 55 56 81 56 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 403
Write 377
Mixed 282
SusWrite 88.8
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 23.3
130% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 140
136% 209 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 70.6%
 Great: 85%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
492GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 145 146 146 146 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 170
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 144
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 92.4%
 Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ Kingston 9905702-010.A00G 04CB DDR4 2400 2OZ 859B BLT8G4D30AETA.K16FE 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 27.1
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.4
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 84.3%
 Great: 85%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69) Builds (Compare 1,900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel  $65Bench 67%, 149,467 samples380x
Core i5-7400Intel  $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples276x
Core i7-7700Intel  $135Bench 76%, 256,717 samples265x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples321x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples228x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples148x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples82x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples60x
A400 120GBKingston  $33Bench 61%, 166,392 samples44x
RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples36x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback