Dell Studio XPS 8000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Studio XPS 8000  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0X231R
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091221
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 02 '19 at 02:16
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 128
63% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 360
36% 295 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
PNY(196E 0974) 2GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.35% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 13.4
9% 11.5 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 13.3
11% 13 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.35%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 98 98 102 100 111 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.2% Above average
Read 241
Write 230
Mixed 216
SusWrite 116
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 23.1
80% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 172
136% 189 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 118%
Seagate Backup+ Desk Mac 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0505
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 24 23 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 167
Write 108
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 23.8
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 112%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
683GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 25 24 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 67.3
Write 89
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 25.3
47% 63 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
224% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 92%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$160
98GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 72 72 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 89.5
Write 86.2
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 72.3
58% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 65%
Samsung HD105SI 1TB
534GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 94 94 94 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 75.5
Write 19.5
Mixed 40
SusWrite 90.6
42% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 60%
Asmedia ASM1053E 750GB
157GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 24 24 22 23 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 103
Write 98.2
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 23.4
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 36%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
279GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 22 22 20 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 99
Write 94
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 21.7
51% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 76%
WD Elements 10B8 750GB
298GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 26.3
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 18.6
32% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 43%
WD My Book 500GB
264GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 22
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 18.7
31% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 22%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
171GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 25 25 23 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 74
Write 77.2
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 24.6
62% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 1.5TB
94GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 22.7
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 23.3
33% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 22%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB
103GB free, PID 6125
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 29 29 30 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 87.2
Write 62
Mixed 59
SusWrite 29.6
75% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
35.9% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 8000 Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 8000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback