Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101222
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '19 at 01:37
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 81.2 1-Core 48.6 2-Core 98.6 49% 76.1 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 193 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Lighting 44.5 Reflection 30.1 Parallax 37.2 36% 37.3 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 40.4 Splatting 35.3 31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR021 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 67 61 70 73 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 314 Write 347 Mixed 285 SusWrite 69.7 57% 254 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 31.1 104% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 25.9 DQ Write 91.3 DQ Mixed 37.7 35% 51.6 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 99%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 169GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 309 325 336 339 343 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	99% Outstanding	Read 422 Write 372 Mixed 334 SusWrite 322 82% 363 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 68 4K Mixed 47.7 148% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 339 259% 350 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 134%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 787GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 103 104 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 102 Write 96 Mixed 76 SusWrite 103 70% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 59%
Asmedia ASM1053E 750GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 378GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 24 Write 15.2 Mixed 20 SusWrite 25.1 16% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 36%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 170 175 174 173 181 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 96.2 Write 140 Mixed 61.2 SusWrite 175 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.8 241% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 90%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 397GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 72 75 73 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 64 Write 63 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 73.7 47% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 131% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 59%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB 10,663 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 465GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 120 120 120 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	70% Good	Read 124 Write 115 Mixed 80 SusWrite 120 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$70 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 110 111 111 111 114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 112 Write 64.5 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 110 64% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% null MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.9% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.87 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.1 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 - $178

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	34x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	32x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	32x

GPU
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples	15x
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	8x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	44x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	28x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $446

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359