PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO P700 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3061-A1 |
Memory | 0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110704 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 04 '19 at 17:30 |
Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
56%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$43
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 72 62 80 85 86 MB/s
|
49.1%
Average
|
|||
45.1%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston ACR256X64D3U13C9G Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
|
44.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 94x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 44x |
Core i7-2600Intel $200Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 34x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 62x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 28x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 25x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |