Fujitsu ESPRIMO P700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO P700 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3061-A1
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110704
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '19 at 13:18
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 169 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 337 45% 337 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Lighting 35 Reflection 26 Parallax 36.2 29% 32.4 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 33.9 Splatting 32.9 29% 35.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$43 19,180 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP64 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 87 99 97 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 10.5 Write 84.3 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 91.5 38% 51.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 204GB free Firmware: 15.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 98 99 100 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 63.2 Write 65.1 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 99.2 50% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U13C9G Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.8% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.8 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 14.5 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO P700 Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P700

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	94x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	44x
Core i7-2600Intel $179Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	34x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	62x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	28x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
SSD 120GBIntensoBench 65%, 3,562 samples	10x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	8x

RAM
99U5474-015.A00LF Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 99U5474-015.A00LF Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 8GBKingstonBench 50%, 11 samples	9x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	6x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,464 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16