Lenovo 10MNS0M600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10MNS0M600  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3106
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '18 at 01:44
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 56.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 203
65% 120 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 342
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3106) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4590
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 8.04
Parallax 5.12
4% 6.19 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 5.03
Splatting 12
6% 6.96 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmt 2115 250GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 204 227 232 273 217 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 302
Write 264
Mixed 236
SusWrite 239
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 17.6
58% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 89.4
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 100
76% 101 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
837GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 202 193 197 200 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 191
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 199
121% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 115%
Great: 112%
HitachiG ST 507GB
439GB free, PID 1014
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 214 183 186 204 211 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
130% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 206
Mixed 187
SusWrite 202
274% 202 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 11.8
1,020% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 14.9
DQ Write 26.8
DQ Mixed 18.8
1,606% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 130%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.8% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 7.5
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback