Lenovo 10MNS0M600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10MNS0M600  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3106
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '18 at 05:53
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 168
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 387
46% 354 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3106) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4590
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 6.12
5% 7.25 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 12.8
7% 7.91 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmt 2115 250GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 321 306 305 302 295 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 337
Write 282
Mixed 250
SusWrite 308
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 23.1
72% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 101
79% 108 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
844GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 202 200 202 201 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 133
Mixed 81
SusWrite 201
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 117%
Great: 112%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
4GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 137 78 76 107 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 107
Write 1
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 99.3
77% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 7.1
638% 9.1 MB/s
DQ Read 9.7
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 8.7
710% 9.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.7% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback