Lenovo 10MNS0M600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10MNS0M600  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3106
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '18 at 06:16
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 67
2-Core 185
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 367
51% 379 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3106) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4590
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.65% Terrible
Lighting 6.13
Reflection 8.73
Parallax 5.59
5% 6.82 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 12.5
7% 7.88 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.65%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmt 2115 250GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 260 303 322 255 324 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 355
Write 310
Mixed 256
SusWrite 298
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 21.9
72% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 108
82% 110 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
846GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 201 201 200 200 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 201
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 201
125% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 117%
Great: 112%
USBDEV Innostor 64GB
60GB free, PID 0903
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 239
Write 68.2
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 68.4
126% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.1
40% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback