Lenovo 10MNS0M600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10MNS0M600  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3106
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '18 at 04:47
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 416
55% 414 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3106) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4590
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.3% Terrible
Lighting 5.77
Reflection 8.04
Parallax 5.22
5% 6.34 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 4.97
Splatting 11.7
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmt 2115 250GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 303 304 251 315 311 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 360
Write 309
Mixed 259
SusWrite 287
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 20.6
67% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 102
80% 110 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
854GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 203 205 201 201 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 168
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 203
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 118%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.2% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback