Gigabyte GA-AB350M-HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350M-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '18 at 08:28
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 210
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 654
66% 537 Pts
64-Core 1,157
72% 1,157 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 31.6
29% 30.9 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 31.8
28% 33.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1364 655 619 649 664 592 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,443
Write 1,970
Mixed 1,307
SusWrite 757
360% 1,619 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 63.5
199% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 612
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 478
353% 472 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 227%
Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 175 159 159 165 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 118
Write 139
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 161
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 106%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
854GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 87 77 86 83 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 85.9
Write 87.4
Mixed 51
SusWrite 81.4
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 51%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 128 130 135 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 172
Write 172
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 129
89% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 121 120 121 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 102
Write 25.9
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 119
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 72%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
998GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 103 105 105 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 116
Write 106
Mixed 82
SusWrite 105
137% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
358GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 36 37 39 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 23.3
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 36.7
43% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 20%
WD i HDT72 External 1TB
276GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.9% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 38.2
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 39.8
50% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback