Gigabyte GA-AB350M-HD3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AB350M-HD3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350M-HD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '18 at 10:35
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 74.6 1-Core 107 2-Core 214 73% 132 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 750 71% 590 Pts	64-Core 1,172 72% 1,172 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Lighting 35.6 Reflection 25.5 Parallax 32 29% 31 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 32.5 Splatting 32.2 28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 354GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1639 850 550 612 535 618 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	217% Outstanding	Read 2,210 Write 1,668 Mixed 1,358 SusWrite 801 336% 1,509 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 61.9 190% 62.8 MB/s	DQ Read 572 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 479 349% 461 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 217% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 165 158 180 155 180 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 138 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 168 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 106%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 854GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 78 88 76 87 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 87.8 Write 85 Mixed 51.2 SusWrite 81.6 56% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 51%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$98 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 120 135 118 135 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 179 Write 183 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 127 95% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 84 89 80 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 55.5 Write 38.5 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 86.8 44% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 72%
WD My Book 1230 3TB 7,778 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 998GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 94 105 92 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 115 Write 112 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 99.3 137% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 926 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 358GB free, PID 0475 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 19 16 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 35.3 Write 21.7 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 17.8 34% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 20%
WD i HDT72 External 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 458GB free, PID 1001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 20 18 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.6% Very poor	Read 40.2 Write 39.5 Mixed 31 SusWrite 18.8 42% 32.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GB 753 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	43.9% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 13.4 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.4 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 91.3 44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AB350M-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-HD3-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	35x
Ryzen 5 1500XAMD $131Bench 66%, 70,038 samples	26x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	22x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	6x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $290

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16