Gigabyte GA-AB350M-HD3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AB350M-HD3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350M-HD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '18 at 12:13
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 73.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 214 72% 130 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 858 76% 644 Pts	64-Core 1,179 73% 1,179 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Lighting 35.6 Reflection 25.6 Parallax 31.9 29% 31 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 32.2 Splatting 32.3 28% 34 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 361GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1681 950 560 614 546 612 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 2,215 Write 1,695 Mixed 1,388 SusWrite 827 342% 1,531 MB/s	4K Read 46.3 4K Write 83.7 4K Mixed 62.7 195% 64.2 MB/s	DQ Read 580 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 482 352% 465 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 166 155 179 158 179 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 101 Write 117 Mixed 73.8 SusWrite 168 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 106%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 861GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 79 87 77 84 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 86.3 Write 79.7 Mixed 52 SusWrite 82.3 55% 75.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 51%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 128 118 135 119 136 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 177 Write 163 Mixed 23 SusWrite 128 88% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 98 98 90 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 104 Write 107 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 99.3 67% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 72%
WD My Book 1230 3TB 7,778 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 998GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 14 12 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 33 Write 30.5 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 13 34% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 926 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 358GB free, PID 0475 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 13 12 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 32 Mixed 31 SusWrite 12.7 36% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 20%
WD i HDT72 External 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 458GB free, PID 1001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 15 13 15 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.3% Very poor	Read 38 Write 31.2 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 14.3 36% 28 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GB 753 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	43.9% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 13.7 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 94.4 42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AB350M-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-HD3-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	35x
Ryzen 5 1500XAMD $131Bench 66%, 70,038 samples	26x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $140Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	22x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	6x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $290

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16