Asus H110M-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H110M-R  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateNov 19 '18 at 16:31
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 218
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 425
57% 425 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.3% Above average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 58
51% 61.6 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 58.6
Splatting 53
49% 60.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OSC mSATA 120GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 154 157 158 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 482
Write 140
Mixed 152
SusWrite 156
51% 233 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 10.5
102% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 66.3
73% 121 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 61%
Patriot Blast 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 92 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 438
Mixed 367
SusWrite 122
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 99
4K Mixed 41.5
156% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 177
175% 279 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
338GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 109 99 116 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 148
Write 131
Mixed 31
SusWrite 112
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3 1.2 3.9 2.5 4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
8.92% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3
6% 7.2 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
100% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.92%
Great: 17%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB
24GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
7.34% Terrible
Read 22
Write 17.7
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 7
18% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.34%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 21.8
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback