MSI Z97-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7845
MotherboardMSI Z97-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150820
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 13 '16 at 23:22
Run Duration635 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 241
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 344
45% 339 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6472
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.2% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 58.1
Parallax 50.9
47% 55.5 fps
MRender 72.7
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 56.7
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 481
Write 200
Mixed 237
67% 306 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 18.3
103% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 48.9
77% 147 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 87%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
20GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 510
Write 324
Mixed 395
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 29.7
125% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 48.3
79% 150 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
630GB free
Firmware: CC3E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 110
Write 99
Mixed 98.9
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.45
101% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 68%
USB2.0 CardReader CF 32GB
14GB free, PID 6230
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.53% Terrible
Read 4.3
Write 4.01
Mixed 4.04
5% 4.11 MB/s
4K Read 0.007
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.008
1% 0.008 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 2%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.95% Terrible
Read 22.9
Write 8.57
Mixed 11
16% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.05
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
28% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 16.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845) Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845) - $224

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $848
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback