Obsidian-pc P95xER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemObsidian-pc P95xER  (all builds)
MotherboardOBSIDIAN-PC P95xER
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180413
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 07:36
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 125
2-Core 248
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 761
71% 593 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 95E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 67.8
53% 68.9 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 61.2
Splatting 68.2
55% 67.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 52%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 95E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6094
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.53% Terrible
Lighting 6.73
Reflection 9.81
Parallax 6.78
6% 7.77 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.13
Splatting 13.6
8% 10 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.53%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 909 1274 608 601 606 604 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,362
Write 1,671
Mixed 888
SusWrite 767
315% 1,422 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 70.8
234% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 739
DQ Mixed 76
176% 349 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 236%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
777GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 437 465 469 460 460 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 463
Mixed 425
SusWrite 442
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 51.4
171% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 222
179% 246 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown + + 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 25
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 24.3
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback