Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170508
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '18 at 03:24
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110 23,169 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 103 2-Core 201 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 502 54% 428 Pts	64-Core 501 31% 501 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50% Average	Lighting 60.7 Reflection 57.7 Parallax 47.1 49% 55.2 fps	MRender 70.3 Gravity 61.9 Splatting 57.3 51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71B1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 116 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 50 (94) Unknown 255 255 0 (95) Unknown 255 255 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 13 (AA) Unknown 100 100 11 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 131078 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 255 255 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 23 (C2) HDA temperature 70 62 163210133534 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 658 (F1) Unknown 100 100 496 (F2) Unknown 100 100 146 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2 (F5) Unknown 100 100 6 (F6) Unknown 100 100 25260	34.2% Below average	Read 144 Write 206 Mixed 242 45% 197 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 7.74 4K Mixed 6 44% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 7.91 DQ Mixed 9.27 22% 50.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 100%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40 13,720 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 297GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 136 4025 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2866 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7560 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2833 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 316 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2549 (C2) HDA temperature 115 90 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.5% Good	Read 105 Write 106 Mixed 100 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.44 112% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 65%
Seagate ST3400620AS 400GB-$55 3,016 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 85GB free Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 90 181446681 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3762 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 95767644 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4649 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2479 (BB) vendor-specific 88 88 12 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 53 588840995 (C2) HDA temperature 35 47 38654705699 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 61 57 35548002 (C5) Current pending sector count 1 1 4294967294 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 1 1 4294967294 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	33.9% Below average	Read 63.3 Write 54.7 Mixed 52.3 43% 56.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.28 78% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
AMD R538G1601U2S- Patriot PSD38G16002 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 18.4 56% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 11.2 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Xeon E5-2665 0IntelBench 67%, 1,061 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2660 0IntelBench 63%, 1,318 samples	1x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 8500 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 4,580 samples	1x
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x
M667 120G 120GBShinediskBench 56%, 237 samples	1x
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GBBench 72%, 3,217 samples	1x

RAM
1x8GBDimm6_ManufacturerBench 25%, 7 samples	2x
HMT151R7TFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 66%, 190 samples	1x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 10% - Terrible

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369