Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '18 at 20:30
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 514
56% 443 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.7% Average
Lighting 60.9
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 46.8
50% 55.1 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 61.9
Splatting 53.8
50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29% Poor
Read 141
Write 148
Mixed 162
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 7.81
4K Mixed 5.28
41% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 7.98
DQ Mixed 5.34
18% 43 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3400620AS 400GB-$55
85GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 64
Write 62.2
Mixed 59.4
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.38
90% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 42%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
0GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61% Good
Read 107
Write 105
Mixed 99.6
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.46
117% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AMD R538G1601U2S- Patriot PSD38G16002 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 18.4
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Terrible Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback