Asus M5A78L-M LX3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M LX3  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 18:24
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 81
1-Core 60.9
2-Core 105
53% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 244
27% 214 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20% Poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 27
21% 27.7 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 19.5
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$33
76GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 68 50 43 50 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.8% Poor
Read 146
Write 91.7
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 73.7
21% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 9.3
39% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 11
DQ Write 16.7
DQ Mixed 11.5
9% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 33 43 84 39 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 13.5
Write 24.1
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 48.7
18% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10.5
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M LX3 Builds (Compare 1,359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX3 - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $324
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback