MSI P67A-GD55 (MS-7681)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMSI MS-7681
MotherboardMSI P67A-GD55 (MS-7681)  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '22 at 08:11
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 185
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 356
47% 355 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
Sapphire(174B E182) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 29.3
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 27.1
24% 29 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 19.5
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 112 72 73 69 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 357
Write 315
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 111
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 15.6
60% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 25.4
32% 55.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G13332 Hynix HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 8502 PSD34G13332 Hynix HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67A-GD55 (MS-7681) Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI P67A-GD55 (MS-7681)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback