Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 29 '16 at 21:43
Run Duration	829 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 67.8 2-Core 129 60% 95.8 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 279 31% 245 Pts	64-Core 283 18% 283 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 36D1) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5382 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Lighting 22.8 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 19.2 19% 19.6 fps	MRender 24 Gravity 20.1 Splatting 17.1 16% 20.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 505 Write 385 Mixed 412 96% 434 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 52.9 4K Mixed 20.4 107% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 37.9 DQ Write 65.4 DQ Mixed 45.2 36% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 115%
Asmt 2105 750GB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 698GB free Firmware: 0 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 88.9 Write 89.8 Mixed 79.7 65% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.24 77% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 65%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB 703 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 60GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	6.98% Terrible	Read 27.1 Write 8.89 Mixed 14.4 18% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.67 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.007 18% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.98% Great: 9%
IS917 innostor 32GB 165 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 29GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 27.2 Mixed 4.07 23% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.37 4K Write 0.56 4K Mixed 0.69 59% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 31%
Imation Mini Express 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 16GB free, PID 0725 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.26% Terrible	Read 31.1 Write 14.9 Mixed 12.7 22% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.11 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.003 23% 2.04 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.26% Great: 33%
IS917 innostor 8GB 308 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 4GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 11.3 Mixed 16.5 22% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.58 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.77 94% 2.88 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.3% Average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 18 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 12.1 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	379x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16