Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive12% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 4.0  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '16 at 14:27
Run Duration328 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 96
2-Core 189
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 335
48% 350 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84DD) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.5306
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 0.15
Parallax 20.1
20% 14.8 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 5.97
Splatting 1.65
8% 11.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 36374 2TB
319GB free
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 55.5
Write 30
Mixed 39.2
9% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.33
4K Write 9.34
4K Mixed 5.59
25% 7.75 MB/s
DQ Read 6.05
DQ Write 8.58
DQ Mixed 4.84
4% 6.49 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 17%
CGM Virtual Disk 36630 2TB
285GB free
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.7% Very poor
Read 67.2
Write 22.9
Mixed 43.8
10% 44.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 9.62
4K Mixed 4.71
25% 7.75 MB/s
DQ Read 9.13
DQ Write 8.11
DQ Mixed 3.81
4% 7.02 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 15%
CGM Virtual Disk 0001 107GB
68GB free (System drive)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 63.1
Write 28
Mixed 34.5
9% 41.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.75
4K Write 9.19
4K Mixed 5.15
25% 7.7 MB/s
DQ Read 9.66
DQ Write 9.9
DQ Mixed 4.9
5% 8.15 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12%
Great: 21%
CGM Virtual Disk 37142 120GB
26GB free
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.2% Very poor
Read 65.5
Write 32.4
Mixed 39.6
10% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.78
4K Write 9.11
4K Mixed 3.97
25% 7.62 MB/s
DQ Read 9.25
DQ Write 8.53
DQ Mixed 4.69
5% 7.49 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-050.A00LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-DS2 4.0 Builds (Compare 584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback