Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '19 at 08:20
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 101
2-Core 198
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 380
51% 383 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 16.5
16% 17.1 fps
MRender 16.6
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 21.4
16% 19.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM 500GB
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X611
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 375
Write 339
Mixed 319
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 22.1
142% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 284
229% 325 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 117%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
206GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 93.2
Write 43.5
Mixed 59.5
49% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-050.A00LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback