HP 750-514

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 750-514  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '18 at 22:20
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 87.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 217
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 422
57% 424 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82F1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4574
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 6.41
5% 7.76 fps
MRender 7.43
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 14.3
8% 8.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 494
Write 151
Mixed 226
63% 291 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 17.2
112% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.5
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 16.9
28% 52.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
920GB free
Firmware: HPH3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 182
Mixed 164
132% 176 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.32
98% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC Kingston HP24D4U7S8MBP-8 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.2% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-514 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 750-514

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback