Monster ABRA A5 V6.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V6.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V6.2
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160616
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 06 '18 at 22:24
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 191
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 544
54% 443 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 5500) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4839
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.33
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 6.09
5% 9.32 fps
MRender 5.62
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 12.7
7% 7.95 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ENGFSMECHTMBT240GB 240GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0824B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 412
Mixed 447
101% 453 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 40.5
142% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 79.3
110% 202 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 101%
Great: 98%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
356GB free
Firmware: FG001A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 55.6
Write 63.4
Mixed 53.8
43% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.25
61% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V6.2 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V6.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback