Dell Precision 7710

Performance Results

Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision 7710  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0PMJX2
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '22 at 22:13
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6920HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 94
2-Core 174
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 464
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Dell(1028 06DA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 7.3
5% 26.3 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 10
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY74D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 829 613 631 639 639 636 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,860
Write 1,426
Mixed 849
SusWrite 664
267% 1200 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 59.5
198% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 642
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 471
369% 513 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 200%
Great: 259%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 308 310 307 307 308 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 419
Mixed 384
SusWrite 321
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 39.7
127% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 311
238% 325 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 24.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 7710 Builds (Compare 1,263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop 59%
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision 7710

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback