Amazon t3.large

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAmazon t3.large  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 17:10
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 128
54% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 128
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 71%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 275GB
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 27 29 25 51 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback