Monster ABRA A5 V6.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V6.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V6.2
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160616
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '18 at 10:51
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 197
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 543
56% 449 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 5500) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.4% Terrible
Lighting 7.07
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 7.06
6% 9.35 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 6.33
Splatting 13.9
8% 8.65 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.4%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ENGFSMECHTMBT240GB 240GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0824B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 406
Mixed 445
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 40.4
144% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 80.9
111% 203 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 101%
Great: 98%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
213GB free
Firmware: FG001A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 60.2
Write 55.9
Mixed 53.1
42% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.26
61% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
31.8% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V6.2 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V6.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback