Asus CG8270

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus CG8270  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8270
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120224
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '18 at 17:44
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 515
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.9% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 65.7
52% 65.5 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 59.4
Splatting 52.1
49% 61.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 501ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 300
Write 217
Mixed 229
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 12
85% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 12.5
26% 49.9 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
181GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 74.5
Write 81.3
Mixed 31.8
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.38
92% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 68%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB
651GB free, PID 01ba
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 27.5
Mixed 15.4
30% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 0.83
4K Mixed 0.19
37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EL64C1C1624Z1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 04CB EL64C1C1624Z1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.5% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 18.4
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8270 Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus CG8270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback