Asus P8B75-M LE

Performance Results

Gaming 17%
Desktop 65%
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LE  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 12:46
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 140
56% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 324
34% 272 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8628) 2GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 33.5
27% 34.1 fps
MRender 30.6
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 24
24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 196 191 195 195 198 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.8% Average
Read 197
Write 195
Mixed 188
SusWrite 194
44% 193 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 21.4
76% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.3
DQ Write 49
DQ Mixed 30.8
25% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 240%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 97 97 98 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 93.9
Write 89.4
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 97.9
61% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 029E CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 12GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.4
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LE Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 63%
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback